Fund, platform or single file: three ways to hold property credit.

Explainer

Published

Family offices held 3% of their strategic allocation in private debt in 2025, according to UBS's 2026 survey of 307 offices. How that money is held matters as much as how much of it there is: a pooled fund, an online platform and a single secured loan give an investor the same asset class and very different rights.

Real estate private credit is lending secured on property by investors other than banks. A family office can hold it in three forms: units in a pooled fund that owns many loans, a share of loans arranged through an online platform, or a direct position in one secured loan, presented as a complete file. The underlying asset is the same in each case, a loan with property behind it. What changes is who holds the security, what the investor can see, when the money can come back, and who is paid along the way. Here is how each route answers those questions, and where each one is strongest.

The pooled fund trades the loan-level view for diversification

In a fund, the manager owns the loans and the investor owns units. That buys spread across many borrowers and properties, professional servicing, and a single subscription in place of many decisions. It also puts a manager between the investor and the loans, with a fee for the role: Preqin put the mean management fee on direct-lending funds at 1.42% in December 2024, and the median for other private debt strategies at 2.00%.

The investor sees the book through the manager's reporting. When the FCA reviewed private-market valuation practices in March 2025, it found that "the industry had converged to quarterly valuation cycles", and added a warning: "A less frequent valuation cycle risks stale valuations." Liquidity depends on the wrapper. A closed-ended fund returns capital as its loans repay over the fund's life; a semi-liquid fund offers periodic redemptions, with limits on how much can leave in each window. The UK's long-term asset fund deals no more than monthly, on at least 90 days' notice, and an FCA consultation of 8 October 2026 proposes similar terms for retail funds that invest mainly in illiquid assets. Those limits have been in use this year: the ECB's May 2026 Financial Stability Review described semi-liquid funds "hit by sizeable redemption requests since the beginning of 2026", and the Bank of England's July report noted that some retail funds were limiting redemptions.

The platform offers loan-by-loan choice, with the security held for the crowd

An online lending platform lets investors pick individual loans, usually in small amounts alongside many others. Because dozens or hundreds of investors share one loan, the security is normally held for them by a security trustee, a company that takes the charge and holds it on trust for everyone on the loan; the FCA's 2019 platform rules refer to "Security Trustees, where used to hold security on behalf of lenders". The land register doesn't show that trust (section 78 of the Land Registration Act 2002), so the name on the register is the trustee's.

That structure is tested when a platform fails. After Lendy went into administration in May 2019, the High Court had to decide in 2021 how investors and Lendy itself, also a beneficiary of the same security trustee, ranked against each other. On Lendy's development loans, the administrators had realised £34.6m and distributed £16m to investors in the first 42 months, as reported in June 2023. The sector has also shrunk: the FCA's December 2025 discussion paper says the amount invested in peer-to-peer loans fell "from approximately £6b in 2021 to £1.4b in 2025", and a property crowdfunding platform, Shojin, entered administration in March 2026.

The single file gives control and asks for concentration in return

A direct position in one loan works the other way round. The investor receives the whole file (the borrower, the valuation, the loan-to-value, the planned exit, the conditions to be met before funding and the security package) and decides on that loan alone. The security can be a first-rank mortgage registered in the investors' favour, so the claim is recorded on the land register and, if the borrower defaults, the enforcement route runs from there.

The trade-offs are just as plain. One loan means one property and one borrower, so diversification comes only from building a portfolio of files over time. The capital is committed for the loan's term, with no redemption window; in exchange, the term is known on the day the investor commits, and repayment comes from the exit the file identifies. And the investor, or its adviser, has to read the file properly, which suits an office with the capacity to do that work or the habit of having it done.

Four questions separate the routes

Whatever the label on the product, four answers tell a family office which route it is really buying. Whose name is on the land register, and what happens to the security if the intermediary fails? What can the investor see, loan by loan, and how often? When can the money come back, and who decides the pace: the loans' own repayment, a manager's redemption window or a gate? And who pays whom, at subscription, every year, and on exit? A fund, a platform and a single file each give a different, legitimate set of answers. The mistake is to buy one while expecting the answers of another.

Where Watson AM fits

Our work sits on the third route. Watson AM arranges single secured loans against European real estate and presents each one to professional and qualified investors as a complete file, after the nine-step diligence described on our approach page. Each investor reads the file and decides on its own side, and the security is a first-rank mortgage registered in the investors' favour as a condition of their funding. Investors pay no fee, we are compensated by our borrowers instead. The trade-offs above apply to our files as to any single loan: each concentrates risk in one property and one borrower and is held to its term, so it suits an investor that values loan-level control over a redemption window. Investor material is available on request.

Common questions

What is real estate private credit?

Real estate private credit is lending secured on property by investors other than banks. Family offices can hold it through a pooled fund, through an online lending platform, or directly in a single secured loan; the underlying asset is a loan with property behind it in each case.

How liquid is a real estate debt fund?

It depends on the wrapper. A closed-ended fund returns capital as its loans repay over the fund's life. A semi-liquid fund offers periodic redemptions with limits per window; the UK's long-term asset fund deals no more than monthly, on at least 90 days' notice. The ECB reported in May 2026 that semi-liquid funds had faced sizeable redemption requests since the start of the year.

How is security held on a property crowdfunding loan?

Usually through a security trustee, a company that holds the charge on trust for all the investors in the loan. In England and Wales the land register doesn't record that trust, so the trustee's name appears on the register. When the platform Lendy failed in 2019, the High Court had to decide how investors and the platform ranked under its security trustee.

Watson AM, Basel. This article is general market commentary for professional and qualified investors and for real-estate developers. It isn't investment, legal, or tax advice, or an offer of any financial product.

Sources

Back to The Casebook